Henville v. Southwest Airlines, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
KRAUSER, Judge.
This Workers’ Compensation appeal demands that we once again consider where the boundaries of the “premises” and “proximity” exceptions to the going and coming rule lie. Specifically, it requires us to determine whether an airport parking lot, neither owned, maintained, or designated for parking by the employer airlines, falls within the former exception and whether the fence, enclosing that lot, which from time to time is climbed by some going to and from work, falls within the latter.
Appellant, Allen Henville, an employee of appellee, Southwest Airlines, Inc., was injured…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Pariser Bakery & State Accident Fund v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Tavel v. Bechtel CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Wiley Manufacturing Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore City v. JohnsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Chaney Enterprises Ltd. Partnership v. WindsorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004