Starrett v. Pier Foundry
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
GARDEBRING, Justice.
This worker’s compensation matter is before us by certiorari upon the relation of Pier Foundry (Pier) and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan (MARP) to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA). The WCCA affirmed the compensation judge’s determination that Lyle Starrett’s injuries, received when Starrett, an employee of Pier, tripped as he alighted from a co-worker’s truck and fell onto Pier’s parking lot on the way to work, were compensable personal injuries under the applicable provisions of the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goff v. Farmers Union Accounting Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Merrill v. J. C. PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Blattner v. Loyal Order of MooseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Kirchner v. County of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Corcoran v. Fitzgerald Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
3Cited by9 opinions
- Foley v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Bailey v. BatchelderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- United Fire & Casualty Co. v. MawCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Hohlt v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- McConville v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.