Kingsley v. Wheeler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Polk county, Watts, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
In this case an action was brought by the plaintiff and respondent to recover from the defendants and appellants profits alleged to have been made by the defendants in the sale of a certain tract of land, under the claim by the plaintiff that at the time of the sale the defendants were her agents. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $600.
The defendants were, the owners of the land described in the complaint, and on June 6 sold the land, three hundred twenty acres, to *361the plaintiff, at the rate of $24.50 per acre, and for a sum of $7,840 in the aggregate. On September 23…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hegenmyer v. MarksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Holmes v. CathcartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Smitz v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Merriam v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Snell v. GoodlanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tarnowski v. ResopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Doyen v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Christianson v. Mille Lacs Land & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Easterly v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Bartleson v. VanderhoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.