Snell v. Goodlander
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Lac qui Parle county, Qvale, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J.2
Action to recover the value of certain crops alleged to be the property of plaintiff, and to have been wrongfully converted by defendant. Defendant had a verdict in the court below, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial. .
The facts are as follows: Defendant was the owner of a farm in Lac qui Parle county, which he listed with plaintiff, a real estate agent, for sale upon specified terms, and conditions. The relation of principal and agent existed between the parties; defendánt being the principal, and plaintiff the agent. Plaintiff endeavored to1 secure a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holmes v. CathcartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Smitz v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Kraemer v. DeustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tarnowski v. ResopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Pederson v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Kingsley v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Farmers' Warehouse Ass'n v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Leonard v. OmsteadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.