Smitz v. Leopold
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants, Henry F. Leopold and wife, from an order of the District Court of St. Louis County, Stearns, J., refusing a new trial. Edson & Hanks, Johns, Michael é Johns, Holcomb dc O’Reilly, for respondents. 0
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The only questions open to the appellants under their assignments of error are — First, whether certain of the findings of fact were justified by the evidence; and, second,, whether “the judgment directed is authorized by the findings of fact or the allegations in the pleadings.” Indeed, it seems to us that the determination of the case must turn wholly upon the question whether the second finding of fact was justified by the evidence; for, if the plaintiffs and' the defendant Henry F. Leopold were dealing with each other entirely at arms’ length, it would be more than doubtful whether any…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Anderson v. KerrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tarnowski v. ResopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Doyen v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Goodhue Farmers' Warehouse Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Merriam v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Christianson v. Mille Lacs Land & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.