Legal Opinion

Doyen v. Bauer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 24, 1941No. 32,896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff sues to recover from defendant as his agent to procure a purchaser of his farm the difference between the agency list and actual sale price which defendant received and by fraud appropriated by falsely representing to plaintiff that the list was the best price obtainable, concealing the fact that as such agent he had an actual purchaser at a higher price, negotiating a sale to the purchaser at the higher price, receiving the purchase money, and accounting to plaintiff for only the list price.

For convenience, we shall, as the parties did, speak of acreage and prices…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Bassett v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Holmes v. CathcartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Diedrick v. HelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Dahl v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API