Hegenmyer v. Marks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, where the action was tried by Lochren, J., without a jury. cited Dambmaim v. Schulting, 75 N Y. 55; Anderson v. Weiser, 24 Iowa, 428; Fox v. Mackreth, 2 Bro. C. C. 400, 420; Morgan v. Elford, L. B. 4 Oh. Div. 352.
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
The plaintiff owned a lot of land in Minneapolis. One Creigh was a real-estate broker, and at his request she employed and authorized him to sell the lot to any one who would purchase it at such sum as would net her $1,050; Creigh to receive as his compensation whatever he could get for the lot in excess of $1,050. At the time of such employing, he (believing it to be true) represented *7•fio Iier, and she believed, that $1,050 was the fair market value of the-lot. Both of them supposed the lot to be entirely vacant; but a third person, owning the adjoining lot, had by mistake constructed on…
2Cited by25 opinions
- McKinley v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Warren v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Holmes v. CathcartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Felt v. BellIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Hershey v. Keyes CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.