Easterly v. Mills
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered October 26, 1908, by direction of the court, after a trial before a jury, dismissing an action to recover for fraud of an agent.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
Action by Louisa Easterly against John Mills and Fred Mills, copartners as John Mills & Son, to recover *357a portion of the proceeds of a sale of real estate made by the defendants as her agent. On trial, and at the close of the evidence, the defendants moved the court to discharge the jury and enter judgment in their favor. Thereupon the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict in her favor. The defendants’ motion being sustained, the action was dismissed. The plaintiff has appealed.
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict. The respondents…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jansen v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Holmes v. CathcartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Stearns v. HochbrunnWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Cottom v. HollidayIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Grigsby v. Western Union Tel. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mersky v. Multiple Listing Bureau of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Ackerson v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Stewart v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- McClure v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. StotskyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.