Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Water Company v. Hild

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1966No. 40769PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

This action - was commenced by Metropolitan Water Company, the plaintiff, to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s and materialman’s lien against property owned by Harold H. Hild and Margaret E. Plild, the defendants. The defendants filed a demurrer to the amended petition of the plaintiff on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action against them. From the orders of the trial court sustaining the demurrer and overruling plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, the plaintiff appeals to this court on the original record. The parties will be referred to in this opinion by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mann v. SchnarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Bangor Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Robbins Plumbing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  4. Berry v. BarbourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Christy v. Union Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. T & S Investment Co. v. CourySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Frontier Rock & Sand, Inc. v. Heritage Ventures, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bell v. TollefsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. H2K TECHNOLOGIES v. WSP USASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. Frontier Rock & Sand, Inc. v. Heritage Ventures, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API