Christy v. Union Oil & Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Disiriei Oourt, Kay County; William M. Bowles, Jucbge. Action by Gus Christy against the Union Oil & Gas Company. Judgment for defendant, and .plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This case presents error from the district court of Kay county. September 28, 1906, plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, filed his petition against defendant in error as defendant, and Earnshaw & Kevan, as partners, for the purpose of foreclosing a subcontractor’s lien. For the purpose of this case it was conceded that the owner of the leasehold was not indebted to the contractor who employed plaintiff, due to the fact that he had, without .the fault of the owner, abandoned the work; the contract provided that until the work was completed the owner should be under no liability to the contractor.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shields v. MorrowTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Pratt v. TudorTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Toledo Novelty Works v. BernheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
3Cited by20 opinions
- Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Basham v. Goodholm & Sparrow Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Brenner Oil Co. v. Dickason-Goodman Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Wm. Cameron & Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Cameron Refining Co. v. JermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.