Legal Opinion

Bell v. Tollefsen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1989No. 71971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

Executive Center Co. and HMS Computer Systems, Inc. 1 negotiated a lease which provided:

“...Tenant’s suite shall be constructed per floorplan drawings and finish schedule as approved by both Tenant and Landlord at Landlord’s sole cost up to a total of $16.00 per usable square foot of leased area. Tenant and Land- (sic) Landlord shall mutually agree to any excess costs and method of payment thereof prior to commencement of construction of Tenant’s suite.... ”

The question presented is whether this lease created an agency relationship subjecting the landlord’s property to a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Agee v. GantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Idaho Lumber, Inc. v. BuckIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Lentz Plumbing Co. v. FeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Berry v. BarbourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Thornton v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  4. Wilger Enterprises, Inc. v. Broadway Vista PartnersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API