Legal Opinion
T & S Investment Co. v. Coury
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 10, 1979No. 51715PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice:
We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals, Division 1 for the reason that Division 1 “has decided a question of substance in a way not in accord with the applicable decision of this Court”, 12 O.S.1971 Ch. 15, App. 3, Rule 3.13A(2).
The Court of Appeals decided among other matters that the limitation of 12 O.S. 1971 § 95 Second 1 did not apply to a civil action based upon a quasi contract. It is this precise and single question that we address and find that the Court of Appeals, Division 1 has erred.
Plaintiff filed an action to recover a share of the costs it incurred in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Okmulgee v. MatlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Berry v. BarbourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Anderson v. CopelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Metropolitan Water Company v. HildSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Ward v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Shebester v. Triple Crown InsurersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Clay v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Fire Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.