Legal Opinion

In re City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1921No. 15908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, French, J., entered January 12, 1920, upon the verdict of a jury awarding damages in condemnation proceedings for a local improvement.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was instituted by the city of Seattle pursuant to a certain ordinance to condemn private property for street, highway, sewer and drainage purposes. The ordinance providing for the improve*536ment did not fix or establish the grade of the proposed street. Upon the trial evidence was received over objection as to what the reasonable grade of the proposed street would be when improved. In submitting the case to the jury, the trial court instructed that in determining damages to the property not taken that the jury might take into consideration what would be the reasonable grade of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ryan v. North Alaska Salmon Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ettor v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Osgood v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. In re Third, Fourth & Fifth Avenues, SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sterling Realty Co. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Beecher v. GilliamWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. Wandermere Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. City of Seattle v. WoodWashington Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API