Legal Opinion

Doolittle v. City of Everett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1990No. 56368-3PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

— Respondent Doolittle (hereinafter Owner) is the owner of four contiguous lots. Three of the lots are improved and used separately from the fourth lot which is developed and used for a separate commercial use. To assess for special benefits in a local improvement district (LID), the City of Everett (hereinafter City) treated the four lots as a single parcel and assessed benefits on the basis of the potential highest and best use of the property as a combined parcel of all lots, with all improvements removed. The Owner protested the proposed assessment as to the fourth lot, improved and used…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. State v. SilverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Abbenhaus v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dahl-Smyth, Inc. v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Dahl-Smyth, Inc. v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bellevue Plaza, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API