Doolittle v. City of Everett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
— Respondent Doolittle (hereinafter Owner) is the owner of four contiguous lots. Three of the lots are improved and used separately from the fourth lot which is developed and used for a separate commercial use. To assess for special benefits in a local improvement district (LID), the City of Everett (hereinafter City) treated the four lots as a single parcel and assessed benefits on the basis of the potential highest and best use of the property as a combined parcel of all lots, with all improvements removed. The Owner protested the proposed assessment as to the fourth lot, improved and used…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. SilverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Abbenhaus v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Dahl-Smyth, Inc. v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Dahl-Smyth, Inc. v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Bellevue Plaza, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.