Legal Opinion

Ettor v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1910No. 8379PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered April 8, 1909, in favor of the defendants, upon granting a nonsuit dismissing an action for damages for the original grading of a street.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

This is an action instituted by plaintiffs to recover damages consequent upon grading certain streets in the city of Tacoma. Under § 47, chap. 84, Laws 1893, and § 48, chap. 153, Laws 1907, such damages were recoverable. The legislature of 1909, Laws 1909, p. 151,. § 1 (Rem. & Bal. Code, § 7815), repealed this law so that no remedy existed at the time this case was tried in the lower court. Judgment was rendered against plaintiffs in the court below, and they have appealed.

Many questions are raised, but we think the act of the last legislature has reduced this case to a single abstract…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Radcliff's Executors v. . Mayor, C. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Murray v. CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Sauer v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. ZornesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bruenn v. North Yakima School District No. 7Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Casassa v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API