Legal Opinion

State v. Wandermere Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 23, 1997No. 15478-5-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, C.J.

This is a condemnation case. The State’s theory of the case would have limited its taking to a 24.45-acre parcel of property, owned by The Wandermere Company and leased to Acme Concrete Company as a sand and gravel pit. Wandermere’s theory of the case expanded the State’s taking to a 62-acre parcel that included not only the 24.45-acre parcel actually mined by Acme but also an additional 37 acres which contained sand and gravel deposits but had not been mined. The jury accepted Wandermere’s theory of the case. The question presented is whether its evidence was legally sufficient to submit…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. CITY OF PUYALLUP v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. City of Puyallup v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API