Legal Opinion

Glover v. Minneapolis Building Trades Council

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 1943No. 33,414PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

The question is whether or not the complaint states a cause of action entitling plaintiff to injunctive relief.

Plaintiff is engaged in the business of building and selling houses. In constructing them he employs union labor, except for furnace installation and sheetmetal work, which he does himself. When he is unable to do the work himself, he lets it to a contractor who employs union labor. Plaintiff is an experienced furnace and sheet-metal worker and holds a license as a gravity warm-air heating installer issued under an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis.

Defendants are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Edelstein v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Coons v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists International UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Burlington Northern Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Dayton Co. v. Carpet, Linoleum & Resilient Floor Decorators' UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. State v. BristSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API