Burlington Northern Railroad v. Commissioner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
The Commissioner of Revenue (Commissioner) appeals from a tax court decision granting summary judgment to Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN) on its claim for a refund of sales and use taxes paid to the State of Minnesota on transportation fuel purchases. The tax court used a “competitive mode” comparison class consisting of rail carriers, motor carriers, air carriers, and barges to find that the state sales and use tax on rail carrier fuel is discriminatory. The tax court reasoned that the use of petroleum excise tax revenues to maintain public highways and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Mary HuddlestonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Trailer Train Co., Railgon Co., Railbox Co. v. State Tax Commission, Director of Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Chapman v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Sprint Spectrum LP v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Alabama Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Jefferson v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.