Legal Opinion
State v. Brist
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 22, 2012No. A10-0979PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
Appellant Amy Lynn Brist appeals from her convictions on six controlled substance crimes. Brist argues that the admission of an audio recording of a statement made by her nontestifying coconspirator to a confidential government informant during a drug transaction violated her rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendmént to the United States Constitution. Because we are bound by Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 107 S.Ct. 2775, 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987), which is identical to this case in all material respects, we affirm Brist’s convictions.
I
A…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Daniel Garcia-Mendoza v. 2003 Chevy Tahoe, Vin 1GNEC13V23R143453, Plate 235JBMSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. Castillo-AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. EichersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State of Minnesota v. Quentin Todd ChuteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.