Legal Opinion
Coons v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists International Union
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 31, 1946No. 34,189PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Plaintiff, having sued for an injunction to restrain defendants, a labor union and certain of its officers, from causing his barbershop to be picketed, appeals from an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the complaint.
The complaint alleges in effect that the purpose of the picketing is to compel plaintiff, the operator of a one-man barbershop, to join the defendant union; that he operates a licensed barbershop, where the hours, prices, and other conditions are as good or better than those in which the members of defendant union are employed; that he has no employes;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. WohlSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cafeteria Employees Union, Local 302 v. AngelosSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- O'Neil v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Angelos v. MesevichNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Glover v. Minneapolis Building Trades CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Riviello v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International Union of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists, International Union of America, Local 256California Supreme Court · 1960
- Journeymen Barbers' International Union, Local 687 v. PollinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Foutts v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists' International UnionOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Dayton Co. v. Carpet, Linoleum & Resilient Floor Decorators' UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.