Legal Opinion
Dayton Co. v. Carpet, Linoleum & Resilient Floor Decorators' Union
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 24, 1949No. 34,893PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
This case comes here on appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to the findings and order of the district court of Hennepin county enjoining defendants from engaging in a strike for the purpose of committing or threatening to commit certain unfair labor practices.
Defendant Carpet, Linoleum and Eesilient Floor Decorators’ Union, Local No. 596, AFL, is a labor organization in the city of Minneapolis whose membership is composed of men and women working generally in the cutting and laying of floor coverings in Minneapolis and St. Paul. The labor organization will be referred to…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- COUNTY OF FREEBORN BY TUVESON v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. Bird Island Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Raulston v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- State v. BristSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.