Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 18, 1974No. 11206, 11207PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINANS, Justice,
This action was precipitated by our holding in Rollinger v. J. C. Penney Co., 86 S. D. 154, 192 N.W.2d 699, wherein service charges of 1 Vz % per month, on revolving charge accounts, were held to violate our usury law. SDCL 54-3-7 to 12. The appellants are challenging summary judgments granted against them, by the trial court which acted in reliance on Rollinger, which held that retroactive effect would not be given to the Rollinger decision. Not desiring to modify Rollinger in any manner, we hereby affirm.
The substance of the revolving charge account agreements involved in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Beitelspacher v. WintherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. One 1966 Pontiac Automobile VIN 252376X159267South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Hohm v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Larsen v. Sioux Falls School District 49-5South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.