State v. One 1966 Pontiac Automobile VIN 252376X159267
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This action arose as the result of the forfeiture of an automobile which purportedly contained a controlled substance. A default judgment was rendered against the automobile by the trial court and the trial court denied appellant’s motion made some thirteen months later to set aside the default judgment. We affirm.
On October 23, 1975, the state of South Dakota commenced a forfeiture proceeding pursuant to SDCL 39-17-129(4) 1 against appellant Jack O’Connor’s automobile by personal service upon appellant of a summons and complaint. The complaint stated the statutory authority for forfeitures,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bramble v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McCafferty v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Cowell v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Baatz v. Arrow BarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of Implicated IndividualSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Vogt v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.