Legal Opinion
Hohm v. City of Rapid City
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 2008No. 24105PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] This case arises out of a one-car accident in a city park in Rapid City, South Dakota (the City). Adam Hohm (Adam) was severely injured when the car in which he was a passenger skidded off a street in the park and landed upside down in a nearby canal. Adam’s parents, Dean and Jean Hohm (Hohms), acting as Adam’s guardians and conservators, brought suit against the City alleging breach of various duties relating to streets. The City filed a series of motions to dismiss on the basis that it owed no duty to Adam. All of the City’s motions were denied and a jury entered a…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Conway v. HumbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kirlin v. HalversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Iverson v. NPC International, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Matter of Implicated IndividualSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Truman v. GrieseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BurkettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.