Legal Opinion

Eistrat v. Brush Industrial Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1954No. Civ. 19841PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages for conversion and injury to property, plaintiff appeals.

The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to defendants (respondents) discloses that on or about August 2, 1948, plaintiff entered into an agreement with Jones Lumber and Mill Company (hereinafter referred to as the vendee) by the terms of which plaintiff gave vendee the right to cut timber on certain property owned by plaintiff. This contract contained among others the following provisions i

“Purchaser is to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Estrada v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hooker v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Whitney v. City & County of San FraniscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Broadway Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Metropolitan EngraversCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Metropolitan Engravers, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Barrett v. Hammer Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API