Hooker v. Thomas
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
— The complaint in this case contains three counts, alleging three separate and distinct causes of action. The material facts in each count were put in issue by the answer. The court below found on all of the issues, under one count, in favor of the plaintiff, and rendered judgment in his favor as prayed for in said count. No findings were made on the issues presented by the other two counts of the complaint. The only point made on this appeal is, that the court below failed to find on all of the material issues presented by the pleadings, and therefore the cause should be reversed.
In other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- McCourtney v. FortuneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Robarts v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eistrat v. Brush Industrial Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Arocena v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- City of Kansas City v. BreyfogleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898
- Kessler v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923