Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Metropolitan Engravers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 27, 1956No. 14564PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
In an action in the District Court, plaintiff Sears, Roebuck1 alleged that all of the defendants conspired to defraud plaintiff in the following manner: Blade was employed by plaintiff in its Los Angeles group of stores as Advertising Manager and as such entered into many contracts with Metropolitan Engravers, Ltd.,2 which manufactured engravings which were sold to and used by plaintiff in newspaper advertising.
According to the allegations, it was agreed between Blade and Engravers, without knowledge or consent of Sears, that Blade personally would receive…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Western Contracting Corp. v. Bechtel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Department & Specialty Store Employees' Union, Local 1265 v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Metropolitan Engravers, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Kassab v. Ragnar Benson, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Department & Specialty Store Employees' Union, Local 1265 v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.