Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Metropolitan Engravers, Limited
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1957No. 14564_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
245 F.2d 67
SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., a corporation, Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN ENGRAVERS, Limited; Metropolitan Mat Service,
Inc.; Gregory F. Duffy, Aubrey A. Duffy, Alfred
Smutz, Walter C. Duffy and Frank R.
Blade, Appellees.
No. 14564.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 27, 1956.
Rehearing Denied March 22, 1957.
Newlin, Holley, Tackabury & Johnston; John L. Wheeler, Hudson B. Cox, George W. Tackabury, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Nathan M. Dicker, William J. Clark, Beverly Hills, Cal., Knudson, Wolfe & Knudson, Tobias G. Klinger, Gerald R. Knudson, Gerald R. Knudson, Jr., Los Angeles,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mgic Indemnity Corporation v. Lawrence I. Weisman, Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. KerstingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Stanley F. Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Vega v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.