Legal Opinion

Ungerer & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 14, 1927No. 2980PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of four commodities known respectively as resinarome oak moss, resinarome orris, resinarome labdanum, and resinarome Peru. They are manufactured abroad., apparently in France, by Charabot & Co., and imported by appellant. They are sometimes referred to as resinoids, but commonly as resinaromes, a trade name over which importer, or Charabot & Co., claims exclusive control. The classification of the two resinaromes first mentioned was considered by this court in Ungerer & Co. (Inc.) v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 534, in which it appeared,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arthur v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Strauss & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Monticelli Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. Robins v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ungerer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Universal Foreign Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Alex W. Block Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API