Legal Opinion

Ungerer & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 28, 1954No. C. D. 1647PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest has been limited to that described on the invoice as “hyperessence oak moss incolore” and assessed with duty at the rate of 30 cents per pound plus 20 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 60 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, for—

All mixtures or combinations containing essential or distilled oils, or natural or synthetic odoriferous or aromatic substances.

It is the contention of the plaintiff that the substance involved is not a mixture or combination…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ungerer & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Mazza v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Rausch v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Adams v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Albert Verley & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API