Legal Opinion

United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 25, 1914No. 1293PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 33749 (T. D. 33778).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The subject of these appeals is a natural ore mined in southern France. Before importation it was ground for the purpose of facilitating the reduction of its contents. When chemically analyzed it was found to consist chiefly of arsenic and antimony in the form of oxides. As to which of these was predominant the evidence is not clear to us, the board, however, finding it was oxide of arsenic. This question of predominance we do not deem important.

The merchandise as imported was in the state nature produced it, except the grinding above mentioned. The appraiser did not consider ■it to be…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Monticelli Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. Ungerer & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. Chemical Specialties Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Kachurin Drug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API