Legal Opinion

Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 13, 1946No. C. D. 982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laweence, Judge:

The plaintiff herein seeks to recover allegedly excessive duties imposed by the collector of customs at the port of Houston, Tex., on an importation invoiced as “Seamless hot rolled A. P. I. Casings made from material Grade ‘C’ in lengths of 25'-32', screwed and socketed, oiled in- and outside.” The merchandise was entered as “seamless steel tubes,” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 328 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “all other finished or unfinished iron or steel tubes not specially provided for.” Plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Arthur v. SussfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Moscahlades Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Ball v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  3. United States v. Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API