Robins v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York (T. D. 29727).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
This case comes to us on an appeal taken from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers to the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York, transferred to this court under the provisions of the act of August 5, 1909.
The merchandise in question is balata belting, composed of balata and cotton, balata being the component material of chief value. The merchandise was assessed at 30 per cent, ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 449 of the tariff act of 1897 providing for “manufactures of * * * india rubber * * * or of which (india rubber) is the component…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arthur's Executors v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hartranft v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Arthur v. SussfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. CochranCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. KahnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Ungerer & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. BussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.