Roy v. Friedman Equipment Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.
The plaintiff Roy brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained when he slipped and fell from a crane which his employer, the plaintiff City Lumber Company of Bridgeport, Inc., was negotiating to purchase from the defendant. The court directed a verdict for the defendant, and from the judgment thereon Roy, hereinafter called the plaintiff, has appealed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the jury could have found the following facts: The plaintiff had been employed as a maintenance man by the lumber company for about seventeen years, his duties…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vinci v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Noebel v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Minicozzi v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Goldberger v. David Roberts Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Phenning v. SilanskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lodge v. Arett Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Hartmann v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Carneiro v. Alfred B. King Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1975
- McDermott v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.