Legal Opinion
Noebel v. Housing Authority
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 17, 1959PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment for the plaintiff entered upon a jury’s verdict. They assign error in the denial of their motions to set aside the verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, in the charge and in rulings on evidence.
The jury could have found the following facts from the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. The defendant housing authority maintained a housing development in which the plaintiff was a tenant. The defendant Carl W. An dersen was the acting manager of the development, which consisted of a number of buildings, each…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Wolfe v. RehbeinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Borsoi v. SparicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Jaworski v. KiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Lodge v. Arett Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Petrizzo v. Commercial Contractors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.