Legal Opinion
Carneiro v. Alfred B. King Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided July 1, 1975No. File 132861PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid M. Shea, J.
The complaint seeks damages for injury to an employee of C. W. Blakeslee and Sons, Inc. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant The Alfred B. King Company breached an implied warranty of merchantability and fitness in manufacturing the steel bracket which broke during the course of employment, causing bodily injury. King successfully impleaded Blakeslee on the ground that it supplied the steel used by King in manufacturing the alleged defective bracket. King, the third-party plaintiff in the impleader complaint, claims damages for an alleged breach of an implied warranty of merchantability…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Crawford v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. Lucibello v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Hoisting Engine Sales Co. v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Kohn Bros. Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Therrien v. Safeguard Manufacturing Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1979
- Massaro v. Turpin, No. 348658 (Nov. 5, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Peterson v. Sabini, No. Cv95 0327596s (Aug. 23, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996