Legal Opinion

Goldberger v. David Roberts Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 31, 1953PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries sustained while he was on vacation in a children’s summer camp operated by the defendants. The injuries resulted from the conduct of a fellow camper. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. In this appeal the defend*630ants assign as error the denial of their motions to set aside the verdict and for judgment non obstante veredicto.

Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the jury would have been warranted in finding the following facts: In the summer of 1949, the plaintiff, then a boy twelve years…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Kos v. Catholic BishopAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Przwgocki v. WikrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lodge v. Arett Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Neal v. Shiels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Masterson v. AthertonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. Noebel v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API