Legal Opinion
Hartmann v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 6, 1988No. 5300; 5983PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action seeking damages for injuries he suffered while operating a radial arm saw manufactured by the defendant Black & Decker Manufacturing Company (Black & Decker) and owned by the defendant J & S Hydraulics, Inc. (J & S), the plaintiffs employer. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of Black & Decker and in favor of the plaintiff against J & S, in accordance with the jury’s *3verdict. J & S appeals from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment for Black & Decker.
The jury could reasonably have found the following…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. GoochSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. DeMatteoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Grenada Steel Industries, Inc. v. Alabama Oxygen Company, Inc. And Sherwood-Selpac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Rodi Yachts, Inc. v. National Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Dollar Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Detroit Institute of Arts Founders Society v. RoseDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.