Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Southern Pac. Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided April 21, 1949No. 6433PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

87 F.Supp. 974 (1949)

DOYLE

v.

SOUTHERN PAC. CO.

No. 6433.

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.

April 21, 1949.

Fred J. L. Schuler and Leahy & Leahy, all of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Carter, Bull & McNulty, and David A. McMullan, all of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

HULEN, District Judge.

Defendant is a Delaware corporation. The complaint is silent as to residence of plaintiff. The removal petition alleges his residence as "Missouri". Plaintiff sues for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted while he was a passenger on defendant's train between Portland,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bertha Jennings v. McCall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. Hayman v. Southern Pacific CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Kenny v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
  4. General Electric Co. v. Central Transit Warehouse Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  5. Smith v. Ford Gum & MacHine Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API