Legal Opinion
Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 7, 1948No. 101, Docket 20782PublishedCited by 133 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment quashing the service of the summons and dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs had not acquired personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a Texas corporation. The complaint was filed in the .state court, and service of the summons (and complaint) was made upon one, Rudolf Pick, as “managing agent” of the local business. The complaint alleged that both the plaintiffs and the defendant made and distributed women’s clothes, on which the plaintiffs used the words, “June Arden,” as a registered trade-mark,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Scripto, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Partin v. Michaels Art Bronze Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.