Legal Opinion

State v. Canney

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 15, 1972No. 6233PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

Each defendant was charged with the same two crimes: injuring property owned by a public utility, New England Telephone and Telegraph Company (RSA 572:3), and larceny of property having a value of one hundred dollars or more. RSA 582:3 (supp.). After a joint trial by jury both defendants were found guilty of the charges against them. All their exceptions, among which were those to the denial of their motions to set aside the verdicts, were reserved and transferred by King, J.

The general issue raised by the defendants on this appeal is whether there was sufficient circumstantial evidence to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CimaszewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. BartlettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. L'Esperance v. SherburneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  5. State v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. Wayne KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. State v. GermainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  3. State v. GruberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. State v. BelknerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. State v. LaRoseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API