Legal Opinion

State v. Gruber

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 9, 1989No. 87-491PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendant, Paul Gruber, was found guilty after a jury trial in Superior Court (Temple, J.) of the crime of theft by deception, RSA 637:4, 11(c), when he was found to have withheld information from his insurance company that was pertinent to the disposition of property that he alleged to have been stolen and for which he was compensated. On appeal of his conviction, the defendant raises questions concerning the introduction of inadmissible evidence, the unconstitutionality of a provision of the theft by deception statute, RSA 637:4, IV (Supp. 1988), the sufficiency of the evidence,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Nicholas Anthony MocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Robert Christopher Ingraham A/K/A Arthur Robert MacKeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Peter L. FrancescoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. BassettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. DushameSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API