Legal Opinion
State v. McGinnis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 3, 1969PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
After a joint trial, the three defendants were convicted by a jury of breaking and entering a commercial vehicle in violation of § 53-74 of the General Statutes. The pertinent portion of § 53-74 makes it a criminal offense to break and enter a commercial motor vehicle with the intent to commit a crime therein. Following his conviction, one of the defendants, Donald McGinnis, was found guilty under the second part of the information which had been filed against him, charging him with being a second offender. General Statutes § 54-118. The three defendants have appealed from the judgments,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.