Legal Opinion

L'Esperance v. Sherburne

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 7, 1931PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

The automobile accident which is the basis of these suits occurred in Hooksett, on the Daniel Webster highway. For convenience the driver of the plaintiff’s car, Arthur L’Esperance, is spoken of as the plaintiff. He was traveling south, the defendant north. The defendant, in turning his car west to enter the driveway to a house on that side of the road, came into collision with the plaintiff’s car. There was evidence that this occurred on the westerly half of the macadam surface of the road.

I. The defendant’s claim that there was no evidence of his liability is clearly unfounded. Without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pullen v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Matthews v. LambertonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ruud v. GrimmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. Strandt v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Fegles Const. Co., Limited v. McLaughlin Const. CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. State v. CanneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. State v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1944

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API