Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 23, 1968PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
The defendants, Stuart B. Smith and George H. Lombra, in a trial to the jury, were convicted of breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a crime therein in violation of §53-76 of the General Statutes. At the trial, each of the defendants was represented by different counsel. In this appeal the same counsel appears for both defendants.
The defendants’ first four assignments of error are addressed to paragraphs of the finding, each of which they claim was found without evidence. There was ample evidence to support these findings, and the claim is without merit.
Both defendants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. GabrielSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. GlennSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.