Legal Opinion
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. v. Surgical Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 4, 2002No. 00-55147PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
285 F.3d 848
KARL STORZ ENDOSCOPY-AMERICA, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SURGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Florida corporation, dba Surgi-Tech; Pacific Medical Repair, a sole proprietorship, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-55147.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 6, 2001.
Filed April 4, 2002.
1
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Mark R. Kravitz, Wiggin & Dana, New Haven, Connecticut, for the plaintiff-appellant.
2
G. Dale Britton, Klinedinst, Fliehman & McKillop, San Diego, California; John Evan Edwards, John & Edwards LLP,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. Penguin Books Usa, Inc., a Corporation Dove Audio, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue Bell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Payless Shoesource, Inc. v. Reebok International Limited and Reebok International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Rolex Watch, U.S.A., Inc. v. Michel Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Moose Creek, Inc. Juno of California, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Yumul v. Smart Balance, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Versatop Support Systems v. Georgia Expo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Aurora World, Inc. v. Ty Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.