Legal Opinion
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Moose Creek, Inc. Juno of California, L.L.C.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 2007No. 06-56774PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge.
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. interlocutorily appeals the district court’s denial of Aber-crombie’s motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining Moose Creek, Inc. from using newly designed moose marks pending the resolution of Abercrombie’s suit alleging trademark infringement and other causes of action under federal and state law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1).
I. BACKGROUND
This is the second time in four years that trademark litigation between these parties has reached this forum. The first litigation began in 2004, when Moose Creek filed a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Salinger v. ColtingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Freecycle Network, Inc. v. OeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Adobe System Inc. v. Blue Source Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Cytosport, Inc. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.