Legal Opinion

Aurora World, Inc. v. Ty Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 15, 2009No. Case CV 09-08463 MMM (Ex)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

Plaintiff Aurora World, Inc. commenced this action on November 17, 2009, alleging copyright and trademark infringement, as well as state law unfair competition and misappropriation claims. 1 Shortly thereafter on November 19, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction, which if granted would enjoin defendant Ty Inc. from selling or marketing its line of Beanie Boo dolls. 2 On December 2, 2009, Ty op posed plaintiffs motion. 3

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Aurora is one of the world’s leading…

2Cases cited184 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  2. Hokto Kinoko Co. v. Concord Farms, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  3. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. WTV Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  4. Moroccanoil, Inc. v. Zotos International, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
  5. Fiji Water Co., LLC v. Fiji Mineral Water USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API