Legal Opinion
Yumul v. Smart Balance, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 24, 2010No. Case CV 10-00927 MMM (AJWx)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Rebecca Yumul filed this putative class action against defendant Smart Balance, Inc. (“Smart Balance”) on February 8, 2010. 1 Yumul’s complaint alleges that she purchased Nucoa margarine, a product manufactured by Smart Balance, repeatedly during the class period, from January 1, 2000 until the present. 2
Yumul alleges that Nucoa contains artificial trans fat, which raises the risk of coronary heart disease by raising the level of “bad” LDL blood cholesterol and lowering the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- In re WellPoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Tait v. BSH Home Appliances Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Jones v. Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.