Legal Opinion
Long v. Mishicot Modern Dairy, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 1967No. Civ. 8329PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order granting a motion to quash service of summons on defendant, a Wisconsin corporation. Defendant was served in the manner provided by section 411, subdivision 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure by service upon the Secretary of State of the State of California who, in turn, sent defendant a copy of the summons and complaint by certified mail to its address in Wisconsin.
Section 411, subdivision 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that if the suit is against a foreign corporation ‘‘ doing business in this state,” summons may be served in the manner provided by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fisher Governor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Compania De Astral, S. A. v. Boston Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Martin v. Detroit Lions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Cornell University Medical College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Kroopf v. GuffeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. JennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Felix v. Bomoro KommanditgesellschaftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.